well said!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2000 3:37 PM
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: IETF Adelaide and interim meetings for APPS WGs
> 
> 
> It has come to the attention of the Applications Area Directors
> that one or more Applications area working groups have elected
> to not meet in Adelaide, and instead to hold an "interim meeting"
> in the United States, presumably because of distance and/or 
> cost issues.
> 
> IETF is an international organization, and it is IETF's longstanding 
> practice to hold its meetings in various locations around the planet.
> This serves both to encourage wider participation in IETF and also
> to more fairly distribute travel costs and inconvenience (over time) 
> among all participants.  The scheduleing of an interim WG meeting in 
> the US in lieu of a WG meeting in Adelaide undermines this policy.  
> This is insulting to non-US participants of IETF (many of whom have 
> attended meetings in the US for years), embarassing to IETF as 
> a whole, and a threat to IETF's international stature.
> 
> Even if a working group has few participants outside the United
> States, a working group does not work in isolation from other
> working groups.  Attendance at IETF meetings is an invaluable 
> mechanism for cross-group collaboration.  
> 
> RFC 2418 states:
> 
>    Interim meetings are subject to the
>    same rules for advance notification, reporting, open participation,
>    and process, which apply to other working group meetings.
> 
> Since normal working group meetings require advance notification
> via email to the entire IETF list, and the process for 
> getting a meeting
> slot involves prior approval of the Area Directors, the same
> requirements apply to interim working group meetings.  Part of the 
> reason for prior approval being required is to ensure that the 
> locations of the meetings are not being chosen to favor certain 
> participants over others.  
> 
> There have been several violations of this policy since publication
> of RFC 2418.
> 
> Therefore,
> 
> - All interim meetings within the Applications Area which were not
>   previously and explicitly approved by the Applications Area 
> Directors, 
>   are hereby cancelled.
> 
> - No Applications Area group will hold any interim meeting prior
>   to April 15.
> 
> - No Applications Area group which does not hold a meeting in 
>   Adelaide, will hold any interim meeting prior to July 31.
>   (i.e. prior to the Pittsburg IETF meeting)
> 
> - This applies to all face to face meetings held for the purpose 
>   of conducting working group discussion and to which the working 
>   group is invited, even if labelled "informal" or otherwise 
>   labelled to distinguish them from official working group meetings.
> 
> - Exceptions to this policy may be made for recently chartered groups,
>   but Area Director approval is still required for such groups to
>   schedule interim meetings.
> 
> 
> for the Applications Area Directors,
> 
> Keith Moore
> 

Reply via email to