At 03:33 PM 02/11/2000 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Given that RFC2267 is over 2 years old now, what *do* you suggest the network >community at large do to motivate the sites that still haven't implemented it? Do you think that if RFC2267 was advanced as a BCP that it would carry more weight, and therefore more ISP's would implement RFC2267-style filtering? Coupled with the latest denial of service attacks? - paul
- Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing attacks Bernie Volz
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing attacks Randy Bush
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing attack... Paul Ferguson
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing attacks Paul Ferguson
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing attack... Paul Ferguson
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing at... Stephen Kent
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofin... Paul Ferguson
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, sp... Stephen Kent
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing attacks Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing attack... Paul Ferguson
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing at... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofin... Daniel Senie
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing at... Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofin... Robert Elz
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, sp... Charles E. Perkins
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding... Paul Ferguson
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding... Daniel Senie
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing attack... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing attacks John Stracke
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing attack... Paul Ferguson