> At 02:50 PM 12/14/1999 , Christian Huitema wrote: > >No. This is no different from the present situation. BGP does not recompute > >routes in case of congestion. It is a problem that we are stuck with today, > >that multi-address multi-homing actually gives us the hope of solving. > > > Only minimally, as long as a TCP connection is tied to an IP address... > > d/ > > ps. Christian and I separately suggested changing this, to support IP > mobility, a few years ago. indeed, and something like this appears to have surfaced again, albeit briefly, in the IPNG working group.. see the sep/oct section of http://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng/html/meetings.html particularly, the "Preserving Active TCP Sessions ( pdf ), P. Tattam " - Bill
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... Sean Doran
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... Sean Doran
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... Jessica Yu
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations info... Christian Huitema
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations ... John Stracke
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocati... Christian Huitema
- Re: IP network address assignments/allo... Dave Crocker
- Re: IP network address assignments... Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: IP network address assignments/allo... John Stracke
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... Jessica Yu
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations info... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations ... David R. Conrad
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocati... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations ... Jessica Yu
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... Graham Klyne