>> There is also a potential scaling issue of using multiple addresses >> as general purpose multihomging mechanism. This is because if this >> is the case, most of the Internet hosts will end up with multiple >> addresses. > >I don't see why this is inherently a problem. This is paradigm shift in the Internet from majority of hosts with single IP address to the majority of the hosts with multiple IP addresses. Many existing support mechanisms such as routing (see Keith's message), DNS name look up, traffic engineering network managment,etc. may not be adequate. It may also break the things that we have not even thought of. And do not forget about operational complexity issues. Are we really ready for such a major shift? So I would not say so quickly that it's not a problem. --Jessica
- Re: IP network address assignments/al... Jessica Yu
- Re: IP network address assignment... Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: IP network address assig... Keith Moore
- Re: IP network address a... Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: IP network address a... John Stracke
- Re: IP network address a... Keith Moore
- Re: IP network address a... Christian Huitema
- Re: IP network address a... Keith Moore
- Re: IP network address a... Daniel Senie
- No Subject Murali K Viswanathan
- Re: IP network address assig... Jessica Yu
- Re: IP network address a... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IP network address a... Jessica Yu
- Re: IP network address a... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IP network address a... Randy Bush
- Re: IP network address a... Kent Crispin
- Multihoming in IPv6 (Re:... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Multihoming in IPv6 ... Kent Crispin
- Re: Multihoming in IPv6 ... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Sean Doran