> > the idea is that IPv6 site renumbering will be so much easier than for > > IPv4 that renumbering will be *less* painful than NATting. > > this needs to be reconciled with the *much* more conservative statements on > v6 renumber-ability coming from respected v6 folk such as deering et alia. Whoa, Randy, time out. Can you cite such a statement which conflicts with what Brian wrote above? Matt
- Re: IP network address assign... Tripp Lilley
- Re: IP network address assign... Keith Moore
- Re: IP network address assign... John Stracke
- Re: IP network address assign... Matt Holdrege
- Re: IP network address assign... Keith Moore
- Re: IP network address assign... Bill Manning
- Re: IP network address assign... Tripp Lilley
- Re: IP network address assign... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IP network address assign... Keith Moore
- Re: IP network address assignment... Randy Bush
- Re: IP network address assign... Matt Crawford
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informat... Bob Braden
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Brian E Carpenter
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations informat... Michael Welzl
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informat... Bob Braden
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informat... Tony Dal Santo
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informat... J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Jon Crowcroft
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations informat... Ian King