> > the idea is that IPv6 site renumbering will be so much easier than for
> > IPv4 that renumbering will be *less* painful than NATting.
> 
> this needs to be reconciled with the *much* more conservative statements on
> v6 renumber-ability coming from respected v6 folk such as deering et alia.

Whoa, Randy, time out.  Can you cite such a statement which conflicts
with what Brian wrote above?
                                        Matt

Reply via email to