> Editor's Note: Press reports of the ACLU's action confused two separate
> issues. The first was a discussion (not a plan) of what should be the
> IETF's policy regarding supporting wiretapping for IETF protocols. This
> had nothing to do with IPv6. The issue was aired at the IETF's November
> meeting, at which strong opposition to supporting wiretapping was voiced.
add "The IETF will be documentating the results of this discussion."
> The second concerned how the autoconfiguration feature of IPv6 could
"The second expressed concern that the auto..."
> compromise a user's anonymity. The IETF replied to this concern in a
> statement available from
"available as" i suspect a url is *popularly* considered to be the document
not it's location.
> http://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng/html/ipv6-address-privacy.html .
randy
