Brian E Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, let's not focus on Bill's data. Frankly, I haven't seen any data > on this topic from any source that really convinces me that it > means much. All I know is that we have thousands of sites using > private address space, which completely falsifies any real data and > makes it impossible to attach any real meaning to concepts such as > "running out of addresses". My personal opinion is that we ran out > of addresses in practical terms around about when RFC 1597 was published. I hate to start a flame war, but Brian is absolutely right. I have clients spending gargantuan amounts of money dealing with layer upon layer of NATs because of this. Some people believe that "we aren't running out of address space" but the fact is that we've already run out. It just isn't available for many essential purposes. Perry
- IP network address assignments/al... Pete Loshin
- Re: IP network address assig... Henning Schulzrinne
- RE: IP network address assig... David Newman
- Re: IP network address a... Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: IP network address a... Christian Huitema
- Re: IP network address assig... Bill Manning
- Re: IP network address a... Randy Bush
- Re: IP network address a... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IP network address a... Randy Bush
- Re: IP network address a... Marc Blanchet
- IETF planning Perry E. Metzger
- IETF planning Dave Crocker
- Re: IP network address a... Yakov Rekhter
- Re: IP network address a... Jon Crowcroft
- Re: IP network address a... Bill Manning
- Re: IP network address a... Steve Deering
- Re: Last Call: Telnet Authentication Option to Pro... Jeffrey Altman
- Re: Last Call: Telnet Authentication Option to Pro... Othon Kamariotis
- Last Call: Telnet Authentication Option to Propose... Othon Kamariotis
- Re: Last Call: Telnet Authentication Option to Pro... Jeffrey Altman
- Re: Last Call: Telnet Authentication Option t... Harald Tveit Alvestrand