I support adoption of the document as well. Thanks, Brian Godiksen SocketLabs
> On Mar 9, 2026, at 3:32 PM, Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Notice: This message was sent from an external sender. Please use caution > when opening links, viewing attachments, or responding. > > This message starts a dkim WG Call for Adoption of: > draft-clayton-dkim2-spec-08 > > This Working Group Call for Adoption ends on 2026-03-16 > > Abstract: > DomainKeys Identified Mail v2 (DKIM2) permits a person, role, or > organization that owns a signing domain to document that it has > handled an email message by associating their domain with the > message. This is achieved by providing a hash value that has been > calculated on the current contents of the message and then applying a > cryptographic signature that covers the hash values and other details > about the transmission of the message. Verification is performed by > querying an entry within the signing domain's DNS space to retrieve > an appropriate public key. As a message is transferred from author > to recipient systems that alter the body or header fields will > provide details of their changes and calculate new hash values. > Further signatures will be added to provide a validatable "chain". > This permits validators to identify the nature of changes made by > intermediaries and apply a reputation to the systems that made > changed. DKIM2 also allows recipients to detect when messages have > been unexpectedly "replayed" and will ensure that Delivery Status > Notifications are only sent to entities that were involved in the > transmission of a message. > > Please reply to this message and indicate whether or not you support adoption > of this Internet-Draft by the dkim WG. Comments to explain your preference > are greatly appreciated. Please reply to all recipients of this message and > include this message in your response. > > Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual > Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2]. > Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions > of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any. > Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be > found at [3]. > > Thank you. > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/ > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/ > [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/ > > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-clayton-dkim2-spec/ > > There is also an HTMLized version available at: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-clayton-dkim2-spec-08 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-clayton-dkim2-spec-08 > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
