On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 10:58 AM Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote:
> > IMHO, the original Bron's idea of a single DKIM2-Delta-Header: per > signature is more practical. Otherwise, it'd be nicer to have: > > DKIM2-Original-From: i=3; YnJvbmdAZmFzdG1haWx0ZWFtLmNvbQo=" > From: d...@lists.ietf.org > DKIM2-Original-Reply-To: i=3; > Reply-To: d...@lists.ietf.org > DKIM2-Original-Subject: i=3; A replacement for DKIM > Subject: [DKIM2] A replacement for DKIM > > Empty fields are equivalent to non-existing. > FWIW if we go with per header mutations, I find this style of inlining the original header name as a suffix is more readable. -Wei
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org
