On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 10:39 AM Dave Crocker <d...@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> fwiw, a bit clunky, but probably not a big deal: > > > “Backscatter” can result from unauthorized use of the (envelope) > > sender of a message, where bulk failure notifications go to an address > > that is not responsible for such unauthorized use. > > Service providers that generate mail on behalf of an entity have no > > visibility into any resulting errors, as they are sent to the entity > > and not the provider. > 'entity' isn't really anchored. Perhaps: > > as they are sent to the entity and not the provider. -> > > as they are not sent the notifications > I'll consider this the first bit of external review feedback and fold it in as part of that process. For everyone's information, the IESG approved the v6 charter for external (i.e., general IETF) review and feedback. That should start any time now and last until February 20th when it returns to the IESG for final review and approval. The time slot allocation (currently marked as a BoF) was also approved. -MSK
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org
