It appears that Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> said: >That makes the assumption that there weren't alternatives a housing the >public keys in DNS that were more secure. There were. There still are, >and they are widely known and deployed.
If there were any evidence that counterfeit DKIM records were a problem, or had even occurred anywhere, ever, I would be more concerned. Sure, it COULD happen, but all sorts of stuff could happen. Part of engineering is making tradeoffs to put the effort toward the problems that matter. R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org
