On 15 Aug 2023, at 5:59, Laura Atkins wrote: > But the reality is: bad-actors are going to get through every process. If we > could ID spammers up front and stop them from spamming we’d very likely have > done it already. In this case, they’re using DKIM in a way that was forseen > by the original authors but not treated as something that needed to be > addressed in the protocol.
That isn’t quite fair. We thought about replay quite a bit, and didn’t see a viable way of addressing it. Your comment makes it sound like we didn’t care. -Jim (one of the original authors) _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
