Hi, All, We have a current version of the draft problem statement available on the data tracker. Murray and a few others made a few comments that were added in the -03 version.
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-dkim/Q5ybHiYkMlg5QFaFp28Y8uSme1Q/ Based on discussions, there seems to be favor to documenting what has been tried and not worked. Question for the working group: Should the discussion of what hasn’t worked be in the problem statement as an Appendix? Or should it be in a separate document as working group output? Along the same lines, do members of the working group feel we should include some of the solution space in the problem statement? Or should the discussion be reworked? Perhaps instead of "possible solution space" maybe "scenarios and how they affect dkim replay" ? We welcome any suggestions of wording changes. laura -- The Delivery Expert Laura Atkins Word to the Wise la...@wordtothewise.com Delivery hints and commentary: http://wordtothewise.com/blog
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
