> On Mar 26, 2023, at 6:13 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 10:29 AM Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com 
> <mailto:m...@mtcc.com>> wrote:
>> On 3/24/23 6:19 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>> > I don't agree with the premise.  I think what was tried and didn't
>> > work should be documented in the result that the working group comes
>> > out with, but not in the problem statement.
>> 
>> There isn't a place in the charter/milestones for that.
> 
> The charter identifies these possible outputs in some combination:
> 
> (1) a clear problem statement;


My understanding so far is this an ESP “Email Service Provider” only issue or a 
domain that allows for free sign-ups for email services using their domains. An 
ESP , i.e. example.esp, can be any size, high or low scale, it allows free 
sign-up service.

My understanding so far is the exploitation are free sign-up accounts using the 
domain to create a template message to some spammer box where the example.esp 
is signing the bound message.  The spammer then massages the message without 
damaging the signature and attacks downlink receivers who accepts the signer 
and/or always trust the example.esp domain.  The presumption is (imo erroneous) 
the receivers are using the same DKIM Reputation Lookup Server that example.esp 
is a member of and that these receivers are using the SDID (Signer Domain 
Identity) as input to a trust service there by bypassing spam security checks.

This is the classic “Batteries Required” syndrome that was predicted with the 
DKIM Reputation Model   With no standard, receivers do not have the tools so 
resolve this problem.

But ESP can do more control their users.   ESP can also make sure users can not 
create signed templates.

We can also finish the DKIM Policy Protocol and basically extend DMARC beyond 
its current limits.  A receiver can probably read a tag ‘-enabled.x’ that tell 
receivers to apply the signature expiration.

—
HLS


_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list
Ietf-dkim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim

Reply via email to