The IESG has completed a review of draft-fz-spring-srv6-alt-mark-15 consistent with RFC5742.
The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Application of the Alternate Marking Method to the Segment Routing Header' <draft-fz-spring-srv6-alt-mark-15.txt> as an Experimental RFC. As the responsible AD for this conflict review I have concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG SPRING, but this relationship does not prevent publishing. I have reviewed this document and also reviewed the SPRING mailing list for any discussion. The work presented here is experiemental and an alternative approach to work already concluded within the IETF. The SPRING WG concluded that they did not have consensus to adopt the work into their working group; during discussion the working group felt that the complexity of adding another altmark was not warranted by the claimed improvement over the IPv6 extension header altmark. So the WG declined to undertake the effort. The IESG would also like the Independent Submissions Editor to review the comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log. The IESG review is documented at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-fz-spring-srv6-alt-mark/ A URL of the reviewed Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fz-spring-srv6-alt-mark/ The process for such documents is described at https://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html Thank you, The IESG Secretary _______________________________________________ IETF-Announce mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
