Hi, Thanks for the reply.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Peter Eckel <li...@eckel-edv.de> wrote: > Hi Jered, > >> This issue was raised by another user yesterday -- Peter Eckel suggested >> reviewing the upgrading notes regarding sysconfig at >> https://www.icinga.com/docs/icinga2/latest/doc/16-upgrading-icinga-2/ > > I don't thing this is the same issue. > > Usman's problem seems to be related to a missing library > libmysql_shim.so.2.9.0. In RHEL/CentOS that library is part of the > icinga2-ido-mysql-2.9.0-1 package. As we don't know whether this is a new > install or an update it's difficult to tell, but I would suspect it's a new > installation and he missed installing the icinga2-ido-mysql package. > Yes, it is a new installation. I am on a new SLE-SP3. I did install the icinga2-ido-mysql package. And there is /usr/lib64/icinga2/libmysql_shim.so.2.9.0. But but it cannot be found. One thing I used CMAKE_SKIP_RPATH=ON while building. Is this the problem? Usman >> This all creates a wishlist for me regarding package managers -- on Debian >> it's never apparent when an upgrade should require careful review of >> documentation due to the potential for breaking changes. I wish there was a >> flag so that apt-get would say "no, dummy, go read the notes first!" >> Creating new dummy package dependencies can have this effect, but it's >> definitely not the right way to do it. > > At least with RPM you can implement OS commands to be executed on > installation, deinstallation, or update, which makes it easily possible to > point the user at important information such as upgrade notes or clean up > stuff that might have accumulated from older versions and is no longer needed > or would breaking an upgrade. I would assume that this is also the case for > the Debian package manager (I haven't packages stuff for Debian yet, so I > can't tell for sure). The package maintainer "just" has to do it. > > This can, however, be quite a pain in the backside if you want to cater for > all versions a user might upgrade from, so I understand fully that most > maintainers don't bother. > > Peter. > > _______________________________________________ > icinga-users mailing list > icinga-users@lists.icinga.org > https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users _______________________________________________ icinga-users mailing list icinga-users@lists.icinga.org https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users