Hi, > On 2. Aug 2017, at 10:08, Johannes Oettl <joe...@zid.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: > > Hello, > > I want to switch to icinga2, and I have a lot of check_mk based snmp-checks. > I have 1 active snmp check per host, and I submit the results as passive > checks > to the core. Right now I submit the check results to the core via checkresult > spool dir.
I would suggest switching to the REST API and rely on https remotely, process-check-result is the action you are looking for. I wouldn’t go the route with command pipe or spool dir. > > Is this possible in Icinga2? What I must modify in my plugin? On a cisco > wireless > lan controller I have over 800 passive checks. Not sure which plugin you’re using. AFAIK checkmk uses their own check plugins which are executed on the master, sending back the check results to the core. Never tried to incorporate checkmk with Icinga 2, and I personally wouldn’t bother to do so. Look for existing check plugins such as check_nwc_health or similar and kill checkmk away. Kind regards, Michael > > regards, > Johannes > > -- > ZENTRALER INFORMATIK DIENST - ABTEILUNG KOMMUNIKATION > TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITAET WIEN > A - 1040 Wien, Wiedner Hauptstrasse 8-10/E020C > Tel.: +43 (1) 58801-420421 > Fax.: +43 (1) 58801-42099 http://www.zid.tuwien.ac.at/kom > > _______________________________________________ > icinga-users mailing list > icinga-users@lists.icinga.org > https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users _______________________________________________ icinga-users mailing list icinga-users@lists.icinga.org https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users
