On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:23:49PM +0000, Michael Friedrich wrote: > >>> Whats the recommended way for transition? > >> > >> Improve your check plugin, or use alternatives. Using modern hardware > >> it shouldn’t be a matter of resources. Given the fact that Icinga 2 > >> runs multi-threaded and check execution does not block the main > >> process, it shouldn’t be an issue either. > > > > I started rewriting checks in C++ > > Why?
Performance? I started an icinga2 instance with a couple hundret
services and our normal checks it immediatly had a load >100 and the
machine basically collapsed so i had to stop it. checks piled up.
> > Exporting the config from
> > our config/inventory database was a matter of a couple of days but
> > now tons of stuff keeps creeping up ...
>
> I don't really understand that sentence - what's your current problem where
> we might help you?
Look at the last weeks - i had questions concerning dependencies for
example ... Still unsolved - i have yet to find a single working
dependency construct. I can see the dependencies in the classic
gui still they have no effect.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de
We need to self-defend - GnuPG/PGP enable your email today!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ icinga-users mailing list icinga-users@lists.icinga.org https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users
