Hi, I’ll have a look into that one and report back to you guys.
Cheers, Eric > On Dec 10, 2015, at 6:14 PM, Bancal Samuel <samuel.ban...@epfl.ch> wrote: > > Hi, > > This sounds quite strange (bug?) > Does anyone has an explication for this? > > Regards, > Samuel Bancal > > On 02. 12. 15 18:25, Lance Reed wrote: >> I am also seeing this and would like to know why this is. It seems to >> happen in my case to how contacts are setup but I have not yet tracked >> down the config issue. That is it looks in the Global history under >> Notifications. >> >> e.g. >> OK at 03:09 NAS-HA: HTTP URL Check Sent out to any contact >> HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 200 OK - 7915 bytes in 0.575 second response time >> >> UP at 03:04 NAS-HA Sent out to any contact >> PING OK - Packet loss = 0%, RTA = 0.31 ms >> >> DOWN at 03:04 NAS-HA Sent out to any contact >> PING CRITICAL - Packet loss = 100% >> >> CRITICAL at 03:03 NAS-HA: Normal Ping Check Sent out to any contact >> PING CRITICAL - Packet loss = 100% >> >> CRITICAL at 03:03 NAS-HA: HTTP URL Check Sent to sysadmin >> CRITICAL - Socket timeout after 10 seconds >> >> CRITICAL at 03:03 NAS-HA: HTTP URL Check Sent to support >> CRITICAL - Socket timeout after 10 seconds >> >> If I look at the local history for the host itself, I see: >> >> UP at 03:52 [ 1/3 ] PING OK - Packet loss = 0%, RTA = 0.49 ms >> >> UP at 03:51 [ 1/3 ] PING OK - Packet loss = 0%, RTA = 0.32 ms >> >> UP at 03:04 [ 1/3 ] PING OK - Packet loss = 0%, RTA = 0.31 ms >> >> NOTIFICATION at 03:04 This notification was not sent out to any contact. >> >> DOWN at 03:04 [ 1/3 ] PING CRITICAL - Packet loss = 100% >> >> NOTIFICATION at 03:04 This notification was not sent out to any contact. >> >> DOWN at 03:02 [ 2/3 ] PING CRITICAL - Packet loss = 100% >> >> DOWN at 03:01 [ 1/3 ] <Terminated by signal 15 (Terminated).> >> >> In this case we got alerts on the service checks but not the host down >> checks, and we were confused why we did not see Host down - which >> should have stopped the service checks from being sent. >> >> 1) Any suggestions where we can look to find out what the config problem is? >> 2) It seems odd that we see "This notification was not sent out to any >> contact." in the history in one place and "Sent out to any contact" in >> another. Could this be a possible bug in icingaweb2? >> >> If so I can file a bug against Version 2.1.0 >> >> Versions in use: >> icinga2-*-2.4.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64 >> icingaweb2-2.1.0-1.el7.centos.noarch >> >> >> Thanks in advance for any ideas. >> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Bancal Samuel <samuel.ban...@epfl.ch> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Browsing the history notifications in Icingaweb2, I can read "Sent out to >>> any contact". >>> What does this mean? >>> Was that sent to all the contacts? In fact I didn't receive anything. >>> Was that sent to no contact? If it's the case then why? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Samuel >>> >>> -- >>> Samuel Bancal >>> ENAC-IT >>> EPFL >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> icinga-users mailing list >>> icinga-users@lists.icinga.org >>> https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users >> _______________________________________________ >> icinga-users mailing list >> icinga-users@lists.icinga.org >> https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users > > -- > Samuel Bancal > ENAC-IT > EPFL > > _______________________________________________ > icinga-users mailing list > icinga-users@lists.icinga.org > https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users -- Eric Lippmann Lead Senior Developer NETWAYS GmbH | Deutschherrnstr. 15-19 | D-90429 Nuernberg Tel: +49 911 92885-0 | Fax: +49 911 92885-77 CEO: Julian Hein, Bernd Erk | AG Nuernberg HRB18461 http://www.netways.de | eric.lippm...@netways.de ** OSDC 2016 - April - netways.de/osdc ** ** OSBConf 2016 - September - osbconf.org ** _______________________________________________ icinga-users mailing list icinga-users@lists.icinga.org https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users
