Am 24.08.2015 um 15:53 schrieb jacques.min...@drv-bund.de:
Hi Thomas,
thanks for you long answer.
I can really understand that we have more possibilities with a db.
Lately I read about an in-memory database for historical tables in
mk_livestatus. Though that's closed source and therefore nothing which
would help us, apart from having to implement such possibilities in the
icinga2 livestatus feature. Imho livestatus is nice, but a dead end
technology-wise as it re-invents the database concepts in many places,
and many of them are poorly designed.
You speak fron the bad design of the old Nagios-style database schema.
Anyone digging into that schema a little more will do so.
Do you plan to do it better, with a new db schema for example ?
We've talked about that in the past, and at some point we might consider
it. But that's something for 2016, or later.
Kind regards,
Michael
--
Michael Friedrich, DI (FH)
Senior Developer
NETWAYS GmbH | Deutschherrnstr. 15-19 | D-90429 Nuernberg
Tel: +49 911 92885-0 | Fax: +49 911 92885-77
GF: Julian Hein, Bernd Erk | AG Nuernberg HRB18461
http://www.netways.de | michael.friedr...@netways.de
** OSBConf 2015 - September - osbconf.org **
** OSMC 2015 - November - netways.de/osmc **
_______________________________________________
icinga-users mailing list
icinga-users@lists.icinga.org
https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users
