Am 22.01.2015 um 19:49 schrieb Michael Martinez:
https://www.icinga.org/icinga/icinga-2/why-icinga-2/
This looks good on paper, Icinga 2 an order of magnitude better . Does it
actually work out like this in practice?
Those benchmarks were actually run, and you're welcome to start your
very own. Fire up a test vm, generate some configuration, and then see
how it performs, compared to your existing setup. Without knowing your
infrastructure in its very detail, I could just say - yes, it's better.
But not the reason and how much more you'll gain, as that depends on
your infrastructure. Though I have never seen high latencies with
icinga2 thanks to its asynchronous check execution/result processing and
much more.
If you don't want to install it yourself, you can also have a look at
the vagrant boxes available at https://github.com/icinga/icinga-vagrant
hth
Michael
_______________________________________________
icinga-users mailing list
icinga-users@lists.icinga.org
https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users
--
Michael Friedrich, DI (FH)
Application Developer
NETWAYS GmbH | Deutschherrnstr. 15-19 | D-90429 Nuernberg
Tel: +49 911 92885-0 | Fax: +49 911 92885-77
GF: Julian Hein, Bernd Erk | AG Nuernberg HRB18461
http://www.netways.de | michael.friedr...@netways.de
** CeBIT 2015 - 16.-20. März 2015 - http://www.netways.de/cebit **
** OSDC 2015 - April - osdc.de **
** Puppet Camp Berlin 2015 - April - netways.de/puppetcamp **
** OSBConf 2015 - September - osbconf.org **
_______________________________________________
icinga-users mailing list
icinga-users@lists.icinga.org
https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users
