Sorry. My fault.

Am 20.03.2014 um 17:52 schrieb Wolfgang <w...@gmx.net>:

> Please create a new thread instead of hijacking an old one.
> 
> Am 20.03.2014 11:41, schrieb Marco Hoyer:
>> Hello all,
>> 
>> we recently updated icinga to 1.11.0 and since then I face a massively 
>> increased amount of db changes, blowing up the bin-log of our mysql instance.
>> The database itself has a size of 4,3GB, which increased a bit since the 
>> update. We have something like 1k hosts with 18k services in the 
>> corresponding datacenter.
>> Looking at the mysql schema-update file shipped with latest update, there 
>> were some new columns and two tables. I’m not sure if this behavior is 
>> caused by that.
>> Is there anybody having an idea about this. I’m a little bit scared and hope 
>> that the growth will stop some time.
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> Marco
>> 
>> Am 20.03.2014 um 10:18 schrieb Serge Noiraud <serge.noir...@bull.net>:
>> 
>>> Le 19/03/2014 20:05, Michael Friedrich a écrit :
>>>> On 13.03.2014 11:48, Serge Noiraud wrote: 
>>>>> Le 13/03/2014 09:42, Michael Friedrich a écrit : 
>>>>>> On 12.03.2014 09:36, Serge Noiraud wrote: 
>>>>>>> Hi, 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I found something strange. 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I have four services in passive mode. Nothing will change their states. 
>>>>>>> The only way to test them was to force one reschedule. 
>>>>>>> It doesn't work anymore. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Logs? Configs? Exact versions? 
>>>>> versions : 
>>>>> the old was 1.8.4 
>>>>> the new one : 1.10.3 
>>>>> 
>>>>> My icinga config : 
>>>>> 
>>>>> The only parameter which is different between the two configs is 
>>>>> passive_host_checks_are_soft : 0 in 1.8 and 0 in 1.10 
>>>> 
>>>> I'm also interested in the service object config extracted from 
>>>> objects.cache 
>>>> 
>>>> 'passive_host_checks_are_soft' seems not to be different, but since that 
>>>> affects hosts only, it shouldn't matter. 
>>> This was an error in the mail : 0 in 1.8 and 1 in 1.10
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> From the icinga page, I click on "select command" then "Re-schedule Next 
>>>>> Service check" then submit. 
>>>>> I continue with force check and commit. 
>>>>> Nothing in the LOGs and nothing appends. 
>>>> 
>>>> Debug log with events/checks/commands tells what? 
>>> The only thing I see with debug=-1 and verbosity=2 is :
>>> 
>>> [1395304966.842148] [008.2] [pid=2224] Service 'Verify_appli1' on host 
>>> 'int:srv:icinga'
>>> [1395304966.842152] [008.2] [pid=2224] Service check should not be 
>>> scheduled.
>>> 
>>> The service is configured :
>>> define service{
>>>     service_description     Verify_appli1
>>>     host_name                  int:srv:icinga
>>>     check_command         check_appels!nombre
>>>     is_volatile                     1
>>>     normal_check_interval  600000 ;  416 days. This is to avoid the pb for 
>>> passive rescheduling check
>>>     retry_check_interval     1440     ; once a day
>>>     max_check_attempts   1
>>>     active_checks_enabled 0
>>>     check_period               workhours
>>>     notification_interval      0
>>>     notification_period       workhours
>>>     notification_options     c
>>>     notifications_enabled   1
>>>     flap_detection_enabled 0
>>>     }
>>> 
>>> For info , we use that possibility for resetting the error on some 
>>> services. Rescheduling the passive service use in this case a check_dummy!0 
>>> command.
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> PS: Please use "reply to list" in your preferred mail client, not "reply 
>>>> to all". 
>>> OK. I used to do that on other lists. So I did the same here.
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I found a workaround, but it's not very user's friendly 
>>>>> I must "enable active check of checked service(s)" then do the 
>>>>> "re-schedule next service check" then "disable active check of checked 
>>>>> service(s)" 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Is it a new bug or some volontary change? 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Dunno. Which external command is used? 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I don't want to set them active because I have no periodicity on this 
>>>>>>> services : it can be one day or three weeks. 
>>>>>>> If it can't be possible anymore, can we set those service in active 
>>>>>>> mode 
>>>>>>> without automatic check ? 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Serge 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Serge Noiraud
>>> Les logiciels libre, c'est mieux : Debian, Firefox, LibreOffice, ...
>>> Tout ce qui n'est pas gratuit ou libre sera perdu définitivement.
>>> 
>>> Développeur projet gramps : http://gramps-project.org/ et osm-gps-map 
>>> :http://nzjrs.github.com/osm-gps-map
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> icinga-users mailing list
>>> icinga-users@lists.icinga.org
>>> https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> icinga-users mailing list
>> icinga-users@lists.icinga.org
>> https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> icinga-users mailing list
> icinga-users@lists.icinga.org
> https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users

_______________________________________________
icinga-users mailing list
icinga-users@lists.icinga.org
https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users

Reply via email to