Hmm...I don't use multiple ido2db processes. I have one ido2db process
running on the "collector" host running the database. Then on my icinga
instances, I have an idomod.cfg where instance_name is set to be unique,
and they use a tcpsocket connection to the ido2db process on the
collector host.
On 2/20/2014 9:38 AM, Florian Rüchel wrote:
Hi Marco,
so if I get this correct, icinga-web is configured with a *single*
database connection and all your IDO2DB instanced write to this very
same database but each with a different instance name so they can be
told apart? If this is the way it works, it seems like an awesome
solution. I connect both instances through an SSH tunnel which is
currently working well enough to keep it this way. Thanks for your
suggestion.
Regards,
Florian
On 20.02.2014 12:00, icinga-users-requ...@lists.icinga.org wrote:
Hi Florian,
>
> we?re using a similar setup. There are f.e. four Icinga instances
with their own ido2db daemon running. In ido2db.cfg each of them is
configured with its own instance name. This results in the status data
getting written in context of the instance, preventing collisions. These
four instances write their status into a mysql database (2 nodes,
master-master replicated), connected to a icinga-web instance. This
allows to have monitoring data of all icinga instances in a single gui.
Until now this works fairly well with round about 10k services. To be
able to issue commands like ?schedule next service check? out of
icinga-web, you can use ssh connection. We also implemented a http
transport solution for it.
>
> Kind regards,
> Marco
>
> Am 19.02.2014 um 03:35 schrieb Florian R?chel
<florian.ruechel.ici...@inexplicity.de>:
>
>>
>> Hey everybody,
>>
>> since for my last problem (see
>>
https://lists.icinga.org/pipermail/icinga-users/2014-February/007931.html)
>> it seems no one knows a solution, I am going to try a different
approach.
>>
>> The scenario is as before: I have two distinct servers running icinga
>> and I want to monitor them in one icinga-web instance. But now, instead
>> of connecting two instances in one IDO2DB I wonder if it is possible to
>> have *two* IDO2DB connections for one icinga-web instance?
>>
>> I looked through the config files and found some settings that indicated
>> this was possible but just trying a configuration with two entries did
>> not work. Is this possible? Is this even reasonable? Or would you guys
>> take a different approach?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Florian
>> _______________________________________________
>> icinga-users mailing list
>> icinga-users@lists.icinga.org
>> https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users
_______________________________________________
icinga-users mailing list
icinga-users@lists.icinga.org
https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users
_______________________________________________
icinga-users mailing list
icinga-users@lists.icinga.org
https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users
