Em 11-02-2014 17:33, Michael Friedrich escreveu: > On 11.02.2014 11:26, Carlos Cesario wrote: >> >> >> One question. >> Why the all services in icinga-node-2 remain "ONLINE" ? Shouldn't >> these services switch to offline too?! >>> I'm not sure what you mean with the term "online" and "offline". >>> Depending on the check authority, those checks being executed on the >>> secondary node will stay in the same state as before and once the >>> cluster connection is re-established, the check history will be >>> synchronized from b->a again. >> I mentioned "online" and "offline" making reference a cluster and >> services states. >>> If you got any better idea feel free to propose/discuss. One of our >>> ideas, which does not really work, was the following: >>> >>> a ----------------------X---------------> b >>> freshness triggers normal check >>> result is stale, not-ok check result, history >>> .... .... >>> <-------connection re-established-----> >>> history out-of-sync history-out-of-sync >>> >>> >>> So that way won't work very well unless you don't are about somewhat >>> mixed/merged history and other strange effects. >>> >>> A different approach could be a special state type (or field) for >>> clustering the service, and based on its authority compared to the >>> current cluster state, it may tell that the current result is stale >>> because the node is down (but that would rather be a ui feature then). >>> >> I agree with you, maybe a new state, or a flag indicating that all >> hosts/services from that cluster is down or disconnected or pending. >> >> See my example, I turn off my checker node yesterday (10/02/2014 - at >> around 18:00), and all services remain "OK" (last status). >> >> Would be interesting anythink to "flag" it. > > I'll discuss it with Gunnar and the team. It's actually a good point, > as none of the current interfaces could reflect that in a correct > manner, independant of statusdat/ido/livestatus/whateverfuturebackend. > > https://dev.icinga.org/issues/5636 > Very good! > Kind regards, > Michael > >
Thanks, Carlos _______________________________________________ icinga-users mailing list icinga-users@lists.icinga.org https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users
