The vast majority of z/OS users don't  need elevated authority, unlike much of 
Windows Workstations.
I don't think it would be a good idea to include Sysprogs and z/OS Security 
Admins in the extended length world.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On
> Behalf Of Tom Marchant
> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2020 1:32 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 2 May 2020 to 3 May 2020 (#2020-125)
> 
> On Mon, 4 May 2020 19:14:31 +0000, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
> 
> >What I would love to see is some sort of "single signon" option, where
> >a user would only need to sign on to their personal workstation and not
> need to explicitly sign on to z/OS at all.
> 
> IMO, this is a bad idea unless you can count on everyone's workstation being
> at least as secure as z/OS is. All you need is one user who gets their PC
> hacked and the hacker has access to z/OS, with whatever authority that user
> has.
> 
> --
> Tom Marchant
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
> [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to