Your claim was "You can specify pretty much anything you want in JCL."

Regardless of why it is coded that way, the code is in the C/I and the error 
message comes from the C/I. The fact remains that you are limited in what you 
can specify in JCL. My first thought was that you meant that JECL had looser 
limits, but I couldn't find thoses paraemters in either JES2 JECL or JES3 JECL.

As a side note, why won't JCL accept all legal e-mail address?


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of 
Timothy Sipples [[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 1:22 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Mainframe user ID length

Shmuel Metz wrote:
>According to MVS JCL Reference, SA23-1385-40, both
>USER=abcdefghi and [email protected] are
>illegal. That's not a JES issue.

It is JES's issue. JCL is simply respecting JES limits there using that
particular syntax. If you want to pass a longer user ID to something else
using a different vocabulary, JCL isn't going to stop you.

Example: Try using JCL to invoke z/OS's FTP client to transfer a file to
an arbitrary FTP server, specifying a user ID longer than 8 characters.
Can it be done? Of course it can; it's perfectly routine. You just don't
use JES-related syntax, that's all.

- - - - - - - - - -
Timothy Sipples
I.T. Architect Executive
Digital Asset & Other Industry Solutions
IBM Z & LinuxONE
- - - - - - - - - -
E-Mail: [email protected]

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to