Actually they Did in Europe. European courts sided with Neon Sent from my iPhone
> On May 1, 2020, at 22:07, Steve Smith <sasd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > No. Neon was a software company. They sold a product called zPrime that > allowed unauthorized usage of zIIP and zAAP for almost any kind of > workload. IBM already runs much of DB2 on zIIP. > > IBM only allows code to run on zIIP when you have specific contracts that > allow you to for specific things. Neon either violated those, or more > likely reverse-engineered it, which is almost certainly a violation of some > other contract they were bound to. > > I don't know any details, but it's hard for me to see how that Neon thought > they were going to get away with it. > > sas > > >> On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 8:42 PM Mike Schwab <mike.a.sch...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Neon was a product to run some DB2 on zAAPs or zIIPs. Only the >> workload specified by IBM could run on those processors. >> >>> On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 5:45 PM Peter Baumann <peterhbaum...@gmx.ch> wrote: >>> >>> In a lawsuit against Neon Enterprise (John Moores) the court ruled in >> favor of IBM. They had to take zPrime out of the market. There was also a >> permanent injunction issued against Neon. >>> >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
