On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:11:17 +0000, Seymour J Metz wrote: >Since Linux has never been certified as Unix, it seems reasonable that he >means Unix System Services. I could find nothing in the current manuals to >suggest that dubbing is mandatory. > I wonder nowadays which comes closer to the current UNIX standard. For example cd/pwd -L/-P are now required and supported by GNU Linux (bash) but not by z/OS /bin/sh. (Others?)
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 09:47:50 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote: > >Do you mean - > >- using z/OS Unix syscalls? >- using the z/OS Unix file system? >- using the z/OS Unix shell? > >FWIW - I contend that there is no such thing as "running under Unix" on >z/OS. All please discuss :-) > From a Rexx point of view, ADDRESS SH is available only if the EXEC is started from a shell or from a shell-like environment. EXECs are not (readily) available from shell and EXECs in UNIX directories are not supported otherwise. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
