I do the okswap after I do a get from the cell pool Thanks
> On Feb 24, 2020, at 8:43 AM, Peter Relson <rel...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > I agree with Rob and Binyamin in worrying about a design that imposes > non-swappability on someone else's address space. > I'll point out that in general TRANSWAP involves "swap in" and "don't > allow subsequent swap-out" and "wait for completion by ECB". > You can't do the wait for completion from an SRB. Once you're within an > SRB in the target space (and thus the space is already swapped in) perhaps > DONTSWAP is sufficient. > > The information provided so far does not show doing some sort of "OKSWAP" > afterwards. It would be inappropriate to leave the space non-swappable. > > In general, in the absence of something like TRANSWAP or DONTSWAP, you'd > have to be disabled from the test for swappability through the data > reference or have a suitable local lock in order to prevent swap-out. > > Peter Relson > z/OS Core Technology Design > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
