It is a very confusing bit of business. I find it clearer to work from D SMF,O rather than the raw parmlib member.
Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Varley Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 7:28 AM To: [email protected] Subject: SMFPRMFxx SYS SUBSYS and EXITs question In an SMFPRMxx member if you have this: ... SYS(NOTYPE(4,5,20,34,35,40) EXITS(IEFU83,IEFU84,IEFU85,IEFACTRT,IEFUJV,IEFUSI, IEFUJP,IEFUSO,IEFUJI,IEFUTL)) SUBSYS(STC,EXITS(IEFUJP,IEFUSO)) ... then why would the IEFU83/84/85 exits not fire for SMF records coming from STCs? Documentation seems to imply that the SYS settings are the default/back-stop for all things. We needed to make the last line read like this to make it work: ... SUBSYS(STC,EXITS(IEFU83,IEFU84,IEFU85,IEFUJP,IEFUSO)) ... The question: Does the list of exits in the SUBSYS specification overwrite all those in SYS, that is, in this case, it reduces the list of exits from the ten in the SYS specification to just the two that are explicitly listed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
