64-bit only? Does this amount to a "stabilization" of support for 31-bit XLC/C++ compilers? BTW: I'm happy to move to 64-bit after IBM supports 64-bit storage for most of their OS services, in the mean time its a PITA with no real advantage for us.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 10:41 AM Allan Kielstra <kiels...@ca.ibm.com> wrote: > Hi Charles > > We are listening! > https://www-01.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/xlCC++V231ForZOsV23?OpenDocument > > This is a web deliverable that co-exists (does not overwrite) the existing > xlC compiler. I have personally used it to develop C++ code with > initializer lists, emplacements in collections, lambdas, variadic template > classes and other more modern features. > > One thing I should point out. For any non-trivial program, the resulting > executable will require POSIX(ON). Also, you should compile an entire > application with the new compiler or the old one. (The object models are > not the same.) > > Anyway read the link and give the compiler a try! > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
