The expression "not one prutah" was still used in the last quarter of the 20th 
Century. See <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_pruta>.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of 
David Spiegel <dspiegel...@hotmail.com>
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 8:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z15 from IBM i perspective

R'Shmuel,
You're mixing monetary systems.
P'rutah was used in Babylonia approximately 2000 years ago, Agorah/Lira
was used last century.

On 2019-09-23 18:57, Seymour J Metz wrote:
> Well, in Hebrew it would be (translated) "He doesn't have even a prutah, 
> where a prutah is a tenth of an agorah and an agorah is a hundredth of a 
> lira; at the time, a lira was worth less than a dollar, so you're looking at 
> just under a mill of wealth.
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http:%2F%2Fmason.gmu.edu%2F~smetz3&amp;data=02%7C01%7C%7C467bb33489c54dedce0708d740796d93%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637048762606308009&amp;sdata=2yHLjVcXd%2B9Rn%2FXo%2BRynbH8iNaR4qHpSJL0kJ4fQvj0%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of 
> Jesse 1 Robinson <jesse1.robin...@sce.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 6:48 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: z15 from IBM i perspective
>
> Thanks for the Yiddish twist. I can hear these phrases echo from my New York 
> origin in-laws. On a different tack:
>
> "He doesn't have a red cent to his name." (Or farthing if you're on that side 
> of the pond.)
>
> Suppose we scrounged through his pockets and found that he did indeed have a 
> red cent (or farthing). Would that sum render him substantially more solvent? 
> There's something about the phraseology that takes it out of the realm of 
> simple finance.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of 
> zMan
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 3:32 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: (External):Re: z15 from IBM i perspective
>
> So you're saying it was translated...carelessly?
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 6:29 PM Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:
>
>> ObPedant "I could care less?"
>>
>> "I could care less." is the result of translating an ironic question
>> in Yiddish into a meaningless statement in English, probably because
>> somebody had a tin ear and didn't pick up on the inflection indicating
>> that it was a question.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>> https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http:%2F%2Fmason.gmu.edu%2F~smetz3&amp;data=02%7C01%7C%7C467bb33489c54dedce0708d740796d93%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637048762606308009&amp;sdata=2yHLjVcXd%2B9Rn%2FXo%2BRynbH8iNaR4qHpSJL0kJ4fQvj0%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on
>> behalf of Phil Smith III <li...@akphs.com>
>> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 4:04 PM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> Subject: Re: z15 from IBM i perspective
>>
>> Charles Mills wrote:
>>
>>> Interesting article even if you could care less about the IBM i
>>> (AS/400
>> for anyone who has been living under a rock for the past 20 years).
>>
>>
>>
>> "couldn't care less" :)
>>
>>
>>
>> BTW, just to be irritatingly pedantic: IBM i is not really AS/400.
>> It's what AS/400 developed into, but it refers to the current
>> generation of the
>> AS/400 OS (formerly OS/400) running on IBM Power. From Wikipedia:
>>
>> IBM i is an operating system that runs on IBM Power Systems and IBM
>> PureSystems. It was named OS/400 when it was introduced with the
>> AS/400 line of computer systems in 1988, was later renamed i5/OS, and
>> was renamed IBM i in 2008 when IBM Power Systems was introduced.
>>
>>
>>
>> So it's confusing, because "AS/400" begat "iSeries" begat "System i"
>> begat "IBM i", only IBM i implies "on Power", whereas the others imply
>> "on bespoke hardware". Sort of as if Apple had renamed Mac OS to macOS
>> when they went to Intel hardware (which is not when they did that).
>>
>>
>>
>> This doesn't really matter nowadays, since anything old enough to be
>> pre-Power is very obsolete, but it's sorta interesting. I find that
>> customers still say "AS/400"; none of the "i" names appear to have
>> ever really caught on.
>>
>>
>>
>> Related: It's "IBM Power", not "PowerPC". PowerPC is the very old
>> precursor to the current generation; this is much like saying your
>> shiny new ThinkPad has a 386-it's sorta kinda in the neighborhood, but
>> really just wrong.
>>
>>
>>
>> Signed,
>>
>> Mr. Pedantic
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> .
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to