On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 01:54:50 +0100, CM Poncelet wrote: >The before/after addresses (on the LHS in the SYSUDUMP) show which >addresses of the excluded lines are "SAME AS ABOVE". > Yes, but the question is, if N lines are identified as excluded, does that mean the single previous line was repeated N times or that the previous N lines were repeated once? The former is rational, but is IBM constrained to be rational?
>On 18/09/2019 21:48, Tony Harminc wrote: >> >> What I've wished for for decades is that if there is just one repeated >> line, they not do the "same as above" processing. The message saves no >> space and just distracts from the flow when reading. >> RFE? (I suspect there may be an argument against complicating such low-level system code. Although within my memory, SYSUDUMP stopped showing lower-case characters as dots. But that might have changed only a translate table.) -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
