On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 22:49:10 -0300, Clark Morris wrote: >This is nice but when I was still doing system type coding I wanted a >tool that converts Assembler mappings to COBOL or PL1. If people >currently in the field would push for getting the BIT, >BINARY-Character, the true binary, IEEE binary and decimal floating >point usages that are in the current COBOL standard, then these >mappings would be even more valuable. One of the justifications for >making the effort is that COBOL should be able to access all data >types that can be stored in DB2. I write this as someone who has used >COBOL to get program and data set usage from SMF data.
What if you could get the compilers to be able to process the Assembler DSECTs? Would that be a better approach? -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
