Agreed!   Our parmlib concatenation consist of the business parmlib that 
resides on MCAT pack, followed by the serverpack provided sys1.ibm.parmlib.    
The sys1.parmlib from serverpack never gets used in our shop, except to take a 
peek at what IBM thinks we should do on something.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Dave Jousma
AVP | Manager, Systems Engineering  

Fifth Third Bank  |  1830 East Paris Ave, SE  |  MD RSCB2H  |  Grand Rapids, MI 
49546
616.653.8429  |  fax: 616.653.2717



-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of 
Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 12:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Clarification on DASD mod conversion of SYSRES

**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**

**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected 
emails**

I'd like to address a question implied in this thread: where should I put the 
installation 'business' PARMLIB, that is, the data set that typically contains 
90+% of all required members, which are often tailored and do not change at all 
from release to release. I would argue strongly in favor of putting this 
PARMLIB on some sysprog-owned volume *away* from the ServerPac set. Some 
reasons and a war story.

-- This user-created and managed PARMLIB will not be unexpectedly updated by 
PTF. 

-- This PARMLIB can contain IBM-, ISV-, and installation-owned members. 

-- This PARMLIB requires little in the way of updates, any one of which could 
possibly finger-check into failure on the next IPL. 

The story. In a previous life, we kept the business PARMLIB on sysres. The VTAM 
guy made a critical change on a remote system shortly before IPL. Then we 
switched sysres to a PARMLIB that did not have this change. VTAM would not come 
up. The data center was 400 miles away. It was before TCP/IP. Fixing the 
problem would be trivial if only we could log on. The only staff on site were 
operators. We were facing a long drive up the California coast just to submit a 
simple job. We were finally able to talk an operator through editing up a job 
(local non-SNA 3270) and submitting it, which corrected the problem. 

Of course we should have had better 'procedures'. Good luck with that. 

.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of 
Brian Westerman
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 12:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: Clarification on DASD mod conversion of SYSRES

You can't IPL with the IPL datasets cataloged to &SYSR1, it fails if you try to 
set &SYSR1 to something in IEASYMxx.  The same is true if you try to use a 
symbolic for the catalog volume(s) (assuming it's separate from the res 
volume(s)), but I think that issue is the ICF catalogs themselves.  You can 
however catalog normal non-vsam datasets to any symbol you want so long as you 
identify it in the IEASYMxx member.  I ALWAYS catalog ALL my DLIB and some 
VENDOR volumes that way, it makes life (and maintenance) a lot easier to be 
able to change the volsers.  

(i.e. one of the sites I manage has their current IPL vols as is C23RS1 (which 
has every cataloged as ******) , C23RS2 ( which has everything cataloged to 
&SYSR2) and C23DL1 (which has everything cataloged to &SYSDL1) , C23DL2 (same 
format but &SYSDL2)  and C23DL3 (same format but &SYSDL3), and the next one 
will be D23RS1, and D23RS2, D23DL1, D23DL2 and D23DL3.  There is no re 
cataloging of datasets necessary, I just change the IEASYMxx member and 
everything is where it needs to be.  My Backup SYSRES's are C23RSA and C23RSB 
and again, I just point the IPL to C23RSA and IEASYMxx is changed to point 
&SYSR2 to C23RSB and everything is set yo IPL and go.

The names of the volumes themselves can be whatever I want to make them easy to 
remember in an emergency, they could be 111111 and 222222 and the process would 
be the same.

It's very easy to do maintenance this way.

Brian


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN **CAUTION EXTERNAL 
EMAIL**

**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected 
emails**

This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be 
privileged.   It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you 
receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any 
manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please 
reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was 
misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your 
assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to