118 or 119 But FTP also cuts, for example, an SMF 15, subject to the parameters of SMFPRMxx.
Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Roger Lowe Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2019 3:22 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SMF PUZZLE On Sat, 24 Aug 2019 17:29:30 +0000, willie bunter <williebun...@yahoo.com> wrote: >Good Day, >I am trying to find the user/job which created a dsn. I run my trustworthy >SMF job which looks for recids 05 14 15 17 18 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 136 139 >163. The job showed the job which read the dsn & deleted it but it doesn't >show who or which job created it.According to the LISTCAT the creation date of >the dsn was Thursday Aug. 22. I read the SMF tape for the previous week and >subsequent days including Aug 22 & 23. >I was thinking if the dsn was created by a FTP or an UNIX upload process which >may not be trapped by SMF >Any thoughts? Any suggestions > If you think it might have been an FTP process, you will need to check out the SMF 118 records. Roger ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
