I do agree that there is a higher level of responsibility required on the part 
of the remote worker to be "available" during the normal working hours and to 
be diligent about the work hours.   Otherwise a perception may be developed 
that you may be less than productive if you are not responding to 
email/IM/phone calls in a similar fashion to "being in the office".

I for one would embrace the flexible work location with certain ground rules 
set ahead of time for what things may require onsite, etc.   As others have 
mentioned, there really are very few technical reasons anymore why someone 
needs to be onsite.   One can waste time just as easily in the office as they 
can at home.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Dave Jousma
AVP | Manager, Systems Engineering  

Fifth Third Bank  |  1830 East Paris Ave, SE  |  MD RSCB2H  |  Grand Rapids, MI 
49546
616.653.8429  |  fax: 616.653.2717


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of 
esmie moo
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2019 12:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Attitude of companies toward mainframers working from home?

**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**

**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected 
emails**

 We were able to work from home until last year.  According  to management's 
explanation "productivity had deteriorated"Now, we all make the trek to the 
office.  A lot of people were caught in a bind because their homes were about 
50 -70 miles away from the city center.  Others had to scramble to find daycare 
for their toddlers.  An immense strain and hardship was exacted on us because 
we now have to pay expensive transportation costs etc.  But as we are reminded 
by management to "count our blessings and we are lucky to have a job".  Amen 
!!!!!
    On Thursday, August 22, 2019, 02:55:34 a.m. GMT-4, Ron Hawkins 
<ron.hawk...@ipsicsopt.com> wrote:  
 
 Charles,

It may be a bit different for a test environment, but up until I left Hitachi 
last year, I was the only MF person that split time between home and the office.

A year later, the MF itself has moved, and none of the testers works on site. 
When I left they were located in both US states and another country. I am doing 
some contract work for them n and split my time between Australia and 
Philippines.

I liked to have our team to train and work face to face occasionally and had 
regular fly-ins of the team for a week. California killed this off as they want 
to declare you a tax resident if you spend more than 60 calendar days in the 
state. Tell that to someone from Nevada.


RON HAWKINS
Director, Ipsicsopt Pty Ltd (ACN: 627 705 971)
m+61 400029610| t: +1 4085625415 | f: +1 4087912585

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of 
Charles Mills
Sent: Thursday, 22 August 2019 06:46
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [IBM-MAIN] Attitude of companies toward mainframers working from home?

I am doing a favor for a friend who is writing a blog article on the above 
subject, with an emphasis on the effect of the shrinking mainframe personnel 
pool. (This is NOT some disguised headhunter pitch. Reply to the list or to me 
personally. I will take full responsibility for "sanitizing" your e-mail 
address and so forth out of what I forward to my friend.)

Does your employer allow mainframe sysprogs and developers to work from home?
Any particular restrictions or qualifications?
Have they changed their policies specifically to address the shrinking 
mainframe personnel pool?
Roughly what percentage of your colleagues work from home?

Thanks!

Charles 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN  

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN **CAUTION EXTERNAL 
EMAIL**

**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected 
emails**

This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be 
privileged.   It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you 
receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any 
manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please 
reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was 
misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your 
assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to