Thanks, this helps me a lot (no action required) :-)
Am 30.07.2019 um 21:43 schrieb Seymour J Metz:
If you don't care about dynamic allocation then a traditional TIOT search will work, as will RDJFCB and SWAREQ. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of Bernd Oppolzer <bernd.oppol...@t-online.de> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 6:51 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: XTIOT impact? It's even simpler: I want to know, if the DDNAME is present in the Job Step JCL, don't care for dynamic allocations etc. Don't even care for the dataset etc., which may be allocated with the DDNAME, because it will be DUMMY anyway in most cases. My question is: is the traditional TIOT scan valid in this case? No need to use some ASM macros or system services with more features? My guess is: yes, still valid. Maybe second question, different use case: if there is a Job Step allocation with a simple DSNAME, no concatenation: will the traditional way to get the DSNAME using RDJFCB and SWAREQ still work? (I hope, I got the macro names right, out of the head). IIRC, SWAREQ translates a 3-byte-handle to a valid 31-bit-address ... Kind regards Bernd
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
