On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 11:41 AM Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:
> > Can a program knowing none of this except that unknown members of X. > > have been manipulated discover with IRXEXCOM that: > > Yes. > > > IRXEXCOM can set Rexx variables. Can't it create new ones simply by > setting them: > > Of course. But you have to be running a REXX script in order to use > IRXEXCOM. > Hum, couldn't the program set up a REXX environment by using IRXINIT? Then use IRXEXCOM to run an in-memory REXX program which uses the SDSF API. Use IRXEXCOM to get & set the REXX variables. Finish up with IRXTERM. I'm just asking, not saying it's possible. https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.ikja300/dup0047.htm https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.ikja300/execrtn.htm https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.ikja300/varacc.htm https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.ikja300/irxterm.htm > > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > -- This is clearly another case of too many mad scientists, and not enough hunchbacks. Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
