If you belong to the SHARE MVSE requirements group, you can discuss Tim's suggestion here:
<https://www.share.org/p/is/vi/iid=171&type=12> Mount improvement with multi-volume, multi-unit allocation <https://www.share.org/p/is/vi/iid=171&type=12> On Fri, 3 May 2019 at 23:10, Tim Hare <haresystemssupp...@comcast.net> wrote: > Figuring that this is 'working as designed', I have started a SHARE > requirement, where discussion could take place. My suggested improvment is > that for multi-unit, multi-volume datasets (and I realize this probably > mostly applies to tape) a consolidated list of volumes for the concatenated > datasets be constructed, and the mounts happen from that list. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Mike Shorkend m...@shorkend.com www.shorkend.com Tel: +972524208743 Fax: +97239772196 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
