On 1 May 2019 16:51:49 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:<byapr01mb4166a8133b83117a5201d0a6bf...@byapr01mb4166.prod.exchangelabs.com>)
jesse1.robin...@sce.com (Jesse 1 Robinson) wrote:
So this is all absolutely true. The module *is* 32760
while the PDS *is* 19069-the ancient 3350 track size that
was fairly standard for load libraries in the Dark Ages.
So what's the mystery? How on earth did the 13 April and
*all previous* runs work OK? We cannot find any evidence
of a change. No IPL that weekend let alone z/OS
maintenance. The link edit date on the fat module is years
old. We restored an older version of the skinny PDS from
HSM. No differences. The DASD upgrade I posted about
earlier came two weeks later.
It should have failed eons ago. This JOBLIB concatenation
has other problems as well that are not obviously related.
Did the JCL change? Did the blksize of the 1st dataset in
the JOBLIB concatenation change?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
