I’m not quite sure why you’re asking me this. However, there are ones that would break compatibility and ones where there is no pressing need to change. Sometimes the same thing. :-)
One has to view virtual storage as an evolution/journey - and some destinations aren’t worth the candle. The “journey” bit is why I mentioned the various versions of Db2. Likewise, z/OS Development has captured its virtual (and real) storage hills as needed. Not all at once. Sent from my iPad > On 4 Apr 2019, at 20:41, Paul Edwards <mutazi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 19:32:01 +0000, Martin Packer <martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com> wrote: >> >> They will be (running 64-bit). However, apart from Db2*, much of their >> virtual storage components can't tolerate being above the bar. > > Which virtual storage components can't tolerate > being above the bar, and why is that and what > would need to change? > > Thanks. Paul. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
