Was there a change in 2.3 that incorrectly caused task end to do a DETACH? Please confirm.
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 11:19:56 -0500 Steven Partlow <spart...@us.ibm.com> wrote: :>On further investigation, SHAREMEMOBJ is also cleaned up at task term of the task that issued the SHAREMEMOBJ. Therefore, job step end would also clean it up. :>We'll fix that. -- Binyamin Dissen <bdis...@dissensoftware.com> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
