I'm sorry I don't understand your technical point. Could you rephrase? As far as I am aware, if you do a:
CALL xxx,VL to set the high bit to signify end of parameter list, then if the target is operating in AM64, it will fail with a S0C4. BFN. Paul. On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 15:12:24 +0000, Gene Hudders <eshudd...@aol.com> wrote: >Again I am sorry but at this point I believe you cannot issue a CALL for a >program in 64 bits. I do nothing when switching back and forth with my CALLs. > >In a message dated 4/4/2019 11:09:16 AM Venezuela Standard Time, >mutazi...@gmail.com writes: > >On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 15:03:43 +0000, Gene Hudders <eshudd...@aol.com> wrote: >> I'm sorry, but I don't have to make any changes> to my 31 bit programs using >> CALLs and using> 64-bit addressing. We have lots of programs> doing both >> AM31 and AM64 with the only change> is the instructions to change the >> addressing mode. >If you are changing addressing mode to31-bit, so that you can cope with >thex'80' bit in a CALL, then you would needto do the same thing with an >AM32program. >> Do you realize how many user programs that> have CALLs embedded in the code >> that would> require eliminating the HO X'80' bit? >A problem that exists when trying toconvert to pure AM64 too. >BFN. Paul. >----------------------------------------------------------------------For >IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,send email to >lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
