On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 10:02:26 -0800, Charles Mills wrote: > ... >I have a started PROC with the typical sort of symbols declared on the PROC >statement. >... >The second step contains //stepname EXEC PGM=program,PARMDD=MYDDNAME > >//MYDDNAME DD *,SYMBOLS=JCLONLY > >I have a // EXPORT SYMLIST=*. I tried it before the first step, in the first >step, and in the second step. > The JCL Ref. says: Chapter 17. EXPORT statement Purpose: Use the EXPORT statement to make specific JCL symbols available to the job step program.
I suspect that "JCL symbols" means SET symbols but excludes PROC args. IBM makes too damned many rules. A name should be a name, whether SET or a PROC arg. > ... >The start fails with a JCL error and IEFC657I THE SYMBOL xxxxx WAS NOT USED >for every single one of the symbols. > .. Tnat message has struck me as insane design since I first encountered it over 40 years ago. Completely backwards. What sane language designer would allow reference to an undefined symbol but fail definition a symbol with no references. (Perhaps a warning, not an error, on the latter would be a courtesy to the programmer.) >What am I doing wrong? Or is the big picture of what I am attempting to do >hopeless? > No more hopeful than an RFE to straighten out the whole mess. And did you know that if a symbol is SET to different values before and after the DD * statement, the one *after* is used!? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN