On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 09:08:07 -0800, Charles Mills wrote: >To the best of my (possibly faulty, of course) recollection SMF does not >record PARM= anywhere under any circumstances -- other than if it somehow gets >used in a way that ends up in SMF, e.g. a program that takes PARM=ddname and >then opens that DD name. (You would get an SMF 14, 15, 42 or 6x for that OPEN >or CLOSE, or an SMF 80 or 230 if the OPEN failed for security reasons.) > This feels like cause fo RFE that IRXJCL itself should record in SMF the member called. Most readers would find the "%SOMETHING" more informative than "IRXJCL".
>On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 14:19:07 +0000, Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh wrote: >> >>Let's say there's a REXX program being run in batch with >>PGM=IKJEFB1B,PARM='%SOMETHING'. >> ... -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
