We've run with 2000 for years. Currently at z/OS 2.3. No problems. . . J.O.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 323-715-0595 Mobile 626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW robin...@sce.com
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Cieri, Anthony Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 11:07 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: IRXANCHR REXX environment value recommendation Since I did not notice any responses, I thought I would offer my 2 cents..... We are NOT running z/OS 2.3 yet, but I did have the need to increase this value a few years ago. The need was predicated on the installation of Tivoli System Automation (TSA). TSA is based upon Netview, which make great use of Rexx. I believe that the limit of anchor CBs is at the address space level and we only ever noticed a problem in TSA. Our current value is 800 (post TSA) and we generally run at about 400 control black in use. Hth Tony . -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Richards, Robert B. Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 1:00 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: IRXANCHR REXX environment value recommendation Anyone have a good recommendation for the value of IRXANCHR on a z/OS 2.3 system? Current value is 1000, but there may be the need for more REXX environments as this value has not been increased in awhile. What's the new "happy value" everyone is using? :) There is no bad answer here. Bob ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
