1. If nobody was using IEFYS, how else would the flower box be printed? On 2018-11-24 14:48, Seymour J Metz wrote: > 1. IEFYS is a really old interface; I didn't think anybody was still using > it. The best place to look is probably the OS/360 documentation at > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbitsavers.org%2Fpdf%2Fibm%2F360%2Fos%2FR20.1_Mar71%2FGC28-6550-9_OS_System_Programmers_Guide_Rel_20.1_Jun71.pdf&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cbd270956a79640dbdde708d65245dd84%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636786857360946751&sdata=SDpk9gv%2BqiCPdB7eUNZdPTtc9Q%2BM8qxr548J8fnU5PI%3D&reserved=0 > > 2. Doesn't IEFACTRT run under the Initiator TCB? I would expect the storage > of the terminating job step to be long gone. > > 3. Show your parameter list and return code. You're running under the > Initiator, so it may be an issue with your security environment. > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http:%2F%2Fmason.gmu.edu%2F~smetz3&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cbd270956a79640dbdde708d65245dd84%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636786857360946751&sdata=GKK3hqgt4uaepi6nw9h80ESrAaOCWmwnBWaw3y3cs%2BA%3D&reserved=0 > > ________________________________________ > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of > Steff Gladstone <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2018 3:53 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit > > Three questions regarding IEFACTRT: > > 1. Where is use of IEFYS for writing messages to the JOBLOG documented? > The example given in the documentation for IEFACTRT is incomplete. Google > doesn't seem to locate the doc as well. > > 2. I am abending on S0C4 because getmained areas are automatically being > freed at end of step, before IEFACTRT gets control. It is not clear to me > if SUBPOOL alone can solve the problem. Do I need to specify > TCBADDR=TCBJSTCB on the STORAGE macro so that the "input TCB" is the > job-step TCB? What course is recommended? > > 3. The documentation says one can dynamically allocate within IEFACTRT but > the BPXWDYN routine returns a non-zero return code. (Same code that works > fine in a regular program.) Is this a limitation of BPXWDYN? Should I code > an SVC 99 call myself? > > Thank you in advance, > Steff Gladstone > > > > On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 at 16:17, Charles Mills <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I use the CSVDYNEX interface extensively and it has been nothing but >> bulletproof in all of my experience. Kudos! >> >> Charles >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht >> Sent: Friday, October 5, 2018 6:20 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit >> >> Peter Relson wrote: >> >>> When the facility was developed, we took a stab at which existing exits >> that we thought were most likely to be of help to the most customers. And >> I'd hope that new exits use it. >> >> That was one of the best stabs I got from Big Blue. It saved me an >> unneeded IPL when one of my SMF exits went down the bit bucket. >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > . >
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
