On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:06:10 -0500, Phil Smith III wrote: > >FSVO "not secure". If you're just creating a fingerprint to detect accidental >damage, it's surely good enough. If you're protecting >your bank account, maybe not so much. Given that the original request was "to >compare these hashes at source (z/OS) and destination >(linux) after transferring some sizable datasets", I suspect it'll be fine. > MitM?
>In any case, ICSF can do it: >https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.csfb400/owh.htm > I notice that CBTTape 900 has an option to include RDWs in the hash. This might be necessary to detect splitting or joining of records. It's simplest if the OP's data can be treated as a simple binary stream. If text, ASCII<->EBCDIC (here we go again) must be verified, and inserted newlines handled. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
