Code points '20'x-'7f'x were not the only important ones. And ASCII was *not* 
who was "colonizing the 256-character wilderness"; that was PC software, and 
lots of PC users were bitten by the incompatibilities. To say nothing of users 
of graphics below '20'x who got bitten by software that treated some of those 
code points as ASCII control characters rather than the characters from code 
page foo.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of 
Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 4:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: So much for THAT excuse | Computerworld SHARK TANK

On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 15:52:44 -0500, Tony Harminc wrote:
>> >
>> >Case sensitivity and null-terminated strings: two historical Unix mistakes 
>> >that have cost untold billions.
>> >
>> And EBCDIC tops them both.  Just count the problems discussed on these lists.
>
>I'd say it's an "EBCDIC in an ASCII world" problem; not anything
>fundamentally wrong with EBCDIC. Imagine if the original IBM PC had
>been an EBCDIC machine. OS/2 and Windows would surely have followed,
>Unicode would've been EBCDIC-based, and we'd live in a different but
>not necessarily worse world.
>
Conversely, if the original S/360 had been an ASCII machine, ...

ASCII antedated EBCDIC.  EBCDIC was the disastrous outcome of
IBM's struggle to meet schedule and cost targets when IBM "bet the
future of the company" on the S/360.  IBM won; customers lost.

ASCII suffered a "jungle of incompatible code pages" similar to that of
EBCDIC -- consider the ISO-Latin variants.  But ASCII had a practical
path to UNICODE because ASCII, unlike EBCDIC, kept important code
points static.  EBCDIC made the irreparable mistake of overloading
common code points rather than colonizing the 256-character wilderness
as ASCII did.

And IBM missed a more recent opportunity by not making z/OS UNIX
System Services ASCII-based like the original IBM PC.

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to